Misc RM 47    Misc reference material

Reference Material - For Information Only!

Over time we have collected a lot of reference material.

We figured it would be better to share with all rather than just delete it.

If you want it, keep it, otherwise just delete it. 

Due to the volume it will take more than one mailing.

The Texas Constitution

Article 5 - JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

Section 2 - SUPREME COURT; JUSTICES; SECTIONS; ELIGIBILITY; ELECTION; VACANCIES

(a) The Supreme Court shall consist of the Chief Justice and eight Justices, any five of whom shall constitute a quorum, and the concurrence of five shall be necessary to a decision of a case; provided, that when the business of the court may require, the court may sit in sections as designated by the court to hear argument of causes and to consider applications for writs of error or other preliminary matters.

(b) No person shall be eligible to serve in the office of Chief Justice or Justice of the Supreme Court unless the person is licensed to practice law in this state and is, at the time of election, a citizen of the United States and of this state, and has attained the age of thirty-five years, and has been a practicing lawyer, or a lawyer and judge of a court of record together at least ten years.

(c) Said Justices shall be elected (three of them each two years) by the qualified voters of the state at a general election; shall hold their offices six years; and shall each receive such compensation as shall be provided by law. (Amended Aug. 11, 1891, Aug. 25, 1945, Nov. 4, 1980, and Nov. 6, 2001.)

Attorney's license???   Ain't no such thing!!!

I. AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT;

A. The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State
Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239
B. The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT!
Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)

II. The "CERTIFICATE" from the State Supreme Court: ONLY authorizes,

1. To practice Law "IN COURTS" As a member of the STATE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.
2. Can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT.
3. INFANTS
4. PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND SEE CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7, SECTION 4.
5. A. "CERTIFICATE" IS NOT A LICENSE....

A. To practice Law AS AN OCCUPATION.
B. Nor to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM!!!

III. The "STATE BAR" CARD IS NOT A LICENSE!!!

A. It is a "UNION DUES CARD"
B. The "BAR" is a "PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION."
1. Like the Actors Union, Painters Union, etc.
2. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license. ALL ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE.
C. It is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.

1. See Attorney General Dan Morales' letter.
2. As per this letter; the State does not issue licenses and they are not issued by his office!

IV. The State Bar is;

A. An Unconstitutional Monopoly, Article 1, Section 26, Texas Bill of Rights.
B. A ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE;
C. Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the Constitution.
D. There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive as the BAR and SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS are doing. ALL MEMBERS OF BOTH ARE MONOPOLISTIC BAR MEMBERS!
E. In violation of the RIGHT TO WORK LAWS of Texas.

V. State Bar Rules. . . at Article III, Section 2. . . Enrollment in the State Bar: "Each person who becomes licensed to practice law is REQUIRED TO ENROLL IN THE STATE BAR WITHIN 10 DAYS "BEFORE" OR "AFTER" RECEIVING A LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW.

ENROLLMENT IN THE BAR AND LICENSE ARE NOT THE SAME.
THE BAR CAN NOT LICENSE ANYONE!!!!!

It is quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has been perpetrated on the people of Texas and America. The American Bar is an offshoot from London Lawyers' Guild and was established by people with treasonous goals in mind. They have accomplished 98% of their goals. The NEW WORLD ORDER is in the saddle NOW. American People start the job for them...or before their "NEW WORLD ORDER" bosses, the International Bankers, gain the remaining 2%. Texas and American Lawyers should check historical records. They will find that the first people "ELIMINATED" in a power shift (no matter who whines) are the lawyers and judges...for they always have proven themselves unworthy of any trust from either side!

"Woe unto you (A woe is a curse) Lawyers! For you have taken away the key of knowledge; you entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in you hindered..." Luke 11:52.

VI. The AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION TRAITORS IN OUR MIDST:

The founding Fathers who wrote our Constitution and formed our government, made it very clear that this was to be a FREE ENTERPRISE country and all Citizens are to be equal under Law and not a private capitalistic monopoly or cartel as they had experienced in Europe.

Under free enterprise system, any Citizen who was willing to risk his time and finances can go into business. The public with the freedom of choice can patronize this business or decide they don't like the service or product and stay away; whereas, in a private or a capitalistic system, only the privileged elite can go into certain businesses or professions such as had been practiced in Europe for ages, making the public their CAPTIVE CUSTOMERS.

The EUROPEAN BANKERS and FINANCIAL CARTELS decided to change AMERICA to the same system that they had so they could take over this government too, and sent some British lawyers over here to organize an American Bar Association on the same order as the English Bar where only Lords can be Judges and determine who shall practice law.

In 1909 they incorporated this TRAITOROUS group in the state of Illinois and had the State Legislature (which was under the control of lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law that only members of this powerful union of lawyers, called the ABA, could practice law and hold all the key positions in law enforcement and the making of laws. At that time, Illinois became an outlaw state and for all practical purposes, they seceded from the United States of America.

VII. The BAR ASSOCIATION then sent organizers to all the other states and explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secure it would be for them, as lawyers, to join this union and be protected by its bylaws and cannons. They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from the Illinois organization. California joined in 1927 and a few reluctant states and their lawyers waited until the 1930's to join when the treasonous act became DE FACTO and the Citizen's became captives. Under this system, the lawyers could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class against the lower class. This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to favor the right and have unlawfully substituted them in place of Constitutional Laws. What is the real difference between the dreaded "Klansman" in white robes and fiery crosses and the ABA "Klansmen" in the BLACK ROBES sitting on the bench? Aren't they as dictatorial as the KGB and the GESTAPO are accused of being? This has fulfilled Orwell's prediction for 1984 and made it a fact, THE BLACK ROBE CULT.

Various groups that have been lawfully stoned walled by the ABA and the courts suggest we join hands and file an initiative to abolish the Bar Association as there are 17 states where Citizens have the Right to do this by the voting process. If we can do this it will destroy, the power of the Bar in America with similar method they used to gain their power, state by state. Any Citizens who live in one of these 17 states, can do this, and if not in one of these states you can contribute to other states that can.

Who is going to run the Courts and practice law if we outlaw the BAR? The CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW COURTS and COMMON LAW non-Union COUNSELORS. I would like to remind you that the Constitution was written in plain English and the Statutes passed by Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of Congress how each law should be used and not the opinions of various Judges as the codes list.

Any normal person can read the Constitution and Statutes and understand them without any trouble. The public in California was shocked to learn that the State Government has no control or jurisdiction over the Bar Association or its members. The state does not accredit the law schools or hold Bar examinations. They do not issue state licenses to LAWYERS. The Bar Association accredits all the law schools, holds their private examinations and selects the students they will accept in their organization and issues them so-called license but keeps the fees for themselves.

The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar a Lawyer. They also select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships and various other offices in the State.

Only the Bar Association or their designated committees can remove any of these lawyers from public office. The State Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated committee of the Bar.

On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State Supreme Court, another of the Bar Associations Judicial Committee's, stated in essence that the Bar should determine the legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot. This is contrary to both State and Federal Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation instituted By and For the People as a Sovereign UNITY of Independent States of We The People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers.

This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union that is incorporated and headquartered in Illinois to hold over the Citizens of California or any other state.

The only recourse is through this initiative process and vote by the people. After the Founding Fathers had formed the Constitution, outlining the laws as to the way our government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in essence, "This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws and run a government as well as or better than royalty and the blue bloods of Europe."

The American people must stop thinking that lawyers are better than they are and can do a better job than they can before the courts of America. Under the Common Law and the Laws of America, no where is it expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation. Corporations are given birth because of ignorance on the part of the American people and are operating under implied consent and power which they have usurped and otherwise stolen from the people. By RIGHT AND LAW THEY HAVE NO POWER, AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION, and must be put out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for FREEDOM.

We cannot hope to reclaim our Country if we continue to let that beast stay in our bed and in our homes. It is imperative that we remove this demon from its throne and put OUR CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW COURTS and JUSTICE SYSTEM, back into effect. We must stop worrying about what someone else will think, this is our country and we have foreign entities attempting to take control of us and our Nation.

These children of Satan have nothing good in store for any of us, and those who are ignorant enough to believe their lies, deceit, and conspiracy, deserve just what they receive because they ask for it.

IX. MOST LAWYERS are OUR ENEMY:

The small handful that are good must get on the right side and help us win our war, or they are not on our side. There can be no more sitting on the fence, people must decide which side they are on and fight. Lawyers that claim to be on our side and are later found out to be traitors, must be put to death as this is just what they have planned for all Americans, who do not abide by their rules and regulations. Americans cannot win the war if they allow traitors to infiltrate our tanks and get away with it. The enemy Americans are fighting is a deadly enemy, that care nothing for anyone out of their own ranks, and if you turn your back on them, you could be their next victim.

X. "TREASON"

LAWYER AND LAWYER-JUDGE COURTS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL:
Since the BIGGEST CRIMES in the world are committed in the courtrooms by lawyers and lawyer-judges AGAINST the people, as the lawyers and their bar associations, which are affiliated with each other INTERNATIONALLY, have joined in the INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM WITHIN (TREASON). They have already taken over the courts and the government, and ALL political parties, where they all take orders from ONE FRONT OFFICE, the offices of the internationally affiliated bar associations; make a ONE PARTY "SYSTEM," the BAR ASSOCIATION PARTY.

This necessitated and URGENT need to form a 2nd political party, the ANTI LAWYER PARTY, where all lawyers and those who attended law school are barred from this 2nd party (ALP).. All the states have unconstitutional aristocratic courts, as their constitutions and/or unconstitutional "lawyer systems" require judges to be lawyers, creating a RULING CLASS, which is FORBIDDEN by Article IV, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution, the 13th Amendment and Article I, Section 26 of the Texas Constitution.

XI. The U.S. Constitution GUARANTEES to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN FORM of government. Any other form of government is FORBIDDEN. No public officer or branch of government can be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES and NOT republics. Also, the lawyers have made themselves 1st Class Citizens, where many public offices and branches of government are open to lawyers only.

All other people are limited to only two branches of government and to only certain offices in those two branches of government, making all people who are non-lawyers into 2nd class subject citizens. When the courts belong to the people, as the United States Constitution REQUIRES, (Article IV, Section 4, we the people, will NEVER rule against themselves.

In these Unconstitutional courts foreign tribunals (hoodlum centers), "men" in black dresses, that are Unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY. (Article 1, Section 9 and 10) with a lot of hanky panky and hocus pocus, dispense a perverted IDIOTology, where the people are terrorized by members of the BLACK ROBE CULT (lawyers and lawyer judges in the courtrooms.

The legislative branch of government does NOT have the Constitutional Power to issue Court Orders or any other kind of Orders.

ONLY presidents and governors have the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers and lawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with "immunity from prosecution."

Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts. The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court rules and procedures; etc.

This is Unconstitutional "lawyer system," only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers) NOT under oath, have access to the courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court. Anything else is Bill of Attainder, NOT permitted under the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10). The U.S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel and this ASSISTANCE of counsel CAN BE ANYONE THE ACCUSED CHOOSES WITHOUT LIMITATION.

XII. LAWYERS and LAWYER-JUDGES:

Created Unconstitutional "lawyer system" pre-trial "motions" and "Hearings" to have eternal EXTORTIONISTIC litigations, which is BARRATRY and also is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, and Article 1, Section 14 of the Texas Constitution as this places defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY a hundred times over. Defendants only have a right to A TRIAL, NOT TRIALS.

When a criminal is freed on a TECHNICALITY, HE IS FREED BECAUSE OF A FIX and a PAY-OFF, as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent BY A JURY NOT BY ANY "TECHNICALITY."

Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, ALL LAWYER-JUDGES HAVE TO DISQUALIFY THEMSELVES, AS THERE CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL and also there would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because "OFFICERS" OF THE COURT ARE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BENCH.

These same LAWYER-JUDGES are awarding or approving LAWYER FEES, directly and indirectly, amounting to BILLIONS OF DOLLARS annually, all in violation of conflict of interest laws.

Since crime and treason are against the law, and the lawyer profession is a crooked profession, a LEGAL BOUNTY should be placed on ALL LAWYERS (betrayers) and all those who are aiding and abetting these TRAITORS, the lawyers. As long as there are lawyers, there will never be any law, constitution or justice. There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS (TRAITORS).

IXV. CASE "LAW" IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL:

As CASE "LAW" IS ENACTED BY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. He also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either "yes" or "No." The lawyer --judge also tampers, fixes, and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he "rules" certain evidence and the truth to be inadmissable. This makes the trial and transcript FIXED and RIGGED, because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH and ALL THE FACTS. Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges.

All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch of government, as they have the Unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (Article 1, Section 9 and 10), "Officer of the court."

Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of government but non-lawyer Citizens are limited to only 2 of the 3 branches of government. Lawyers as 1st class citizens, can be hired or elected to any of the three branches of government. Lawyers, "Officers of the Court," in the Judicial Branch, are Unconstitutionally in 2 branches of government AT THE SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or legislative branches. This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the conflict of interest laws.

District attorneys and State's attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries FROM the people, where the people are DENIED ACCESS to the grand juries when they attempt to present evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. TRY TAKING THIS MATERIAL TO THE GRAND JURIES! The U.S. Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law, is not and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper and we would have millions of interpretations (Unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now. That is why all judges and public servants are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U.S. Constitution, NOT interpret it.

Imagine hypothetically how stupid it would be if any constitution stated, "that the judicial branch of government has the power to interpret this constitution."

ORGANIZED CRIME never existed until the BAR ASSOCIATION took over OUR COURTS and OUR GOVERNMENT. Now crime is organized internationally, just as the Bar Associations are organized. Some of their international affiliations include but are not limited to THE INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSOCIATION; INTERNATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION; WORLD PEACE THROUGH LAW CENTER; WORLD ASSEMBLY OF JUDGES: et al. This means that the Bar Associations are not only the INTERNATIONAL CRIME SYNDICATE, but also the INTERNATIONAL WORLD GOVERNMENT and INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST PARTY.

XV. Under INTERNATIONAL ORDERS:

ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or 50 years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME. All lawyers have to file the same motions and follow the same procedures in using the same Unconstitutional "lawyer system" of hanky panky and hocus pocus, and to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM WITHIN by always ruling AGAINST THE PEOPLE. ALL LAWYERS AND LAWYER JUDGES ARE GUILTY OF "TREASON."

In probate, the lawyers place themselves in everyone's will and estate. When there are minor children as heirs, the lawyer-judges appoint a lawyer (a child molesting Fagin) for EACH CHILD and, at times, the lawyer fees EXCEED the total amount of the estate.

An OUTRAGEOUS amount of TAX "MONEY" is directly and indirectly STOLEN BY LAWYERS. Money that is budgeted to County Boards, School Boards and other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL of these agencies are "TRICKED" and "FORCED" into ETERNAL EXTORTIONISTIC LITIGATION.

In all elections, VOTE AGAINST ALL LAWYERS, never vote for a lawyer. Vote FOR NON-LAWYERS ONLY. If only lawyers are running for election to the same office, do NOT vote for any of them, as most are ALL ALIKE. All lawyers are programmed to be "TRAITORS AND INHUMAN CLONES."

WALK SOFTLY AMERICANS AND CARRY A BIG STICK

Most importantly don't be afraid to use it. We are under vicious assault and we must make use of every resource we have, or give into their slavery. COPY AND SPREAD WIDELY, SEND COPIES TO THE CRIMINAL LAWYERS AND LAWYER-JUDGES.

IS THIS WHAT MAKES YOU SUBJECT TO INCOME TAX?
YOU BETTER THINK REAL HARD.

READ EACH WORD AND DON'T MAKE ASSUMPTIONS.

26 CFR 1.864-4. This section is used to define what it means to carry on a trade or business within the United States among other sections of the code. This section is critical and explains why the IRS answered Interrogatories the way they did that was posted on the net a few days ago. They made admissions but inferred there were other SECTIONS other than 26 CFR 1.861 sources.

The fact that 1.861-8 (f) contains the statement that income that come from an "effectively connected trade or business" with the United States is a source to which the tax on income applies, is a key.

When reading 1.864-4, although it applies to non-resident aliens, gives a clearer picture. That picture shows that whether you are either a US citizen or a non-resident alien, your income from a source "effectively connected with a trade or business with the United States" is taxable. THAT IS A REVENUE TAXABLE ACTIVITY. Isn't an excise tax essentially a use tax for a privilege?

What is a trade or business? I had defined this, in detail, in my book Which One Are You. What I did not define SPECIFICALLY as a "Trade or Business" in that section of my book, but elsewhere, was the following that is found in 26 CFR 1.864. A trade or business is defined as dealing with the banking system. The Federal Reserve System has been delegated the fiscal agent of the United States to carry on the United States Trade or business using the debt obligations of the United States as the medium of exchange and transfer of same. This becomes one of the key elements of the tax on income because it is based on the amount of Federal Reserve "notes" and is why there is no dollar sign such as this $ appearing on any assessment, and, therefore, the liability that IRS does not want to talk about. It is presumed you know that the figures are in dollars. NOT SO. Prove they are MONEY dollars when none exist. Did you not transfer your check for worthless pieces of paper as stated by the Federal Reserve? It's right on the Internet under Federal Reserve and I posted it twice on e-mails. Monopoly dollars, yes.

When you get paid by check it is drawn on a bank by the company using that very banking system. You cash that check on the bank it is drawn without having an account. Any other bank you present it to will require you to have an account. Most banks will cash a check for under a thousand without an account. By law, all banks are "sister" banks under the same law and have to cash that check. When it is cashed you receive the debt obligations of the United States in a "transfer". It is not money as it only represents money. I am not here to go into all the laws, statutes and Regs., and will not because to do so this would be 1000 pages and I will let you do the research. I am just giving you why you MAY be subject to the income tax. For those of you that have Which One Are You, go to pages 160 to 162 then to pages 52 and 74 in that order. For those of you that don't, you will have to buy the book if you want to know.

The handling of these debt obligations and the income tax were both passed in the same year for a reason. The reason is evident when you get done reading this short article. Those debt obligations are the Federal Reserve Notes that represent IOU's of the United States to the Banking system that the United States created in 1913. The use of the Federal Reserve "notes" is an absolute commercial process no matter how you cut it. You are dealing in commercial paper that is not defined as money or a "Note" in the UCC. It is private scrip with a trade mark imprinted on the face of the note. Yes, Federal Reserve Notes are trademarked because they belong to a private banking cartel. That's why the government cannot charge you with counterfeiting money of the United States. Even the Federal Reserve says they are worthless paper until used to exchange for substance. You can be charged with infringing on the trade mark by printing Federal Reserve "notes" carrying the trade mark.

Now, do you think the government is going to admit to this in a court case and blow the whole scam to wide open? You bet your sweet bippy they won't. You can only counterfeit MONEY as described in their CONSTITUTION, and Federal Reserve "notes" are not money since they only are worthless pieces of paper representing money. But, can they be representative of money because you cannot redeem the "notes" for MONEY at par. MONEY is never REDEEMABLE. Go ahead and take a dollar to a bank and demand the real MONEY that it is supposed to represent. They will not do it. The letter I have from the Comptroller's office, by Russell Munk, states that they can only be exchanged for the same paper money as there is no MONEY available backing the "note". Sure because it is private scrip. Now those that have my book will know what transfer means. Are you not transferring the debt and they want their cut for the Use of that transfer? The Transfer is the excise taxable activity carrying on a "trade or business" with the United States agents, the banks.

Now read very carefully 26 CFR 1.864 and you will see that any dealings with the banking system, in any form, deposits, withdrawals, etc., are considered "carrying on a trade or business with the United States". That's why they don't care who the hell you are, citizen, non-resident alien, foreigner, neutral, whatever. They all use scrip, don't they? What is one of the sources mentioned in 1.861-8? Banking, any kind of banking. So the use of the Federal Reserve Notes is subject to an income tax for the excise privilege of using the private trademarked scrip of the fiscal agent of the United States banking system in "transfer". Check out Title 12, 31 and 26. It is all there if you would but pick it up and read it.

Once you transfer a certain amount of private IOU debt obligations you are subject to the liability that comes from using the private scrip in the trade or business of the United States. Why are they debt obligations? Now you see why they are first liens on all property that you think you own, but do not. This comes directly from the Federal Reserve page itself where they say the notes are worthless. Here are a few excerpts:

"Federal Reserve notes represent a first lien on all the assets of the Federal Reserve Banks, and on the collateral specifically held against them. Federal Reserve notes are not redeemable in gold, silver or any other commodity, and receive no backing by anything. This has been the case since 1933. The notes have no value for themselves, but for what they will buy. In another sense, because they are legal tender, Federal Reserve notes are "backed" by all the goods and services in the economy."

Now do you know why the government wants a part of the first lien in the form of taxes to pay the Federal Reserve its' interest? Not one stinking dime goes to pay the government services they say you get. It goes to the Credit of the United States debt owed the Federal Reserve. On the back of all canceled checks returned to you from the bank it says, PAY TO THE CREDIT OF THE UNITED STATES TO ANY FED. RES. BANK. Are you not dealing in "a Trade or Business" of the United States when dealing in banking holding and receiving these debt obligations to which they can call in a portion of the lien denominated "Income Taxes" that are true EXCISES for the use of the debt obligations? Here is more:

Question
I thought that United States currency was legal tender for all debts. Some businesses or governmental agencies say that they will only accept checks, money orders or credit cards as payment, and others will only accept currency notes in denominations of $20 or smaller. Isn't this illegal?

Answer
The pertinent portion of law that applies to your question is the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 102. This is now found in section 392 of Title 31 of the United States Code. The law says that: "All coins and currencies of the United States (including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations) . . . shall be legal-tender for all debts, public and private, public charges, taxes, duties and dues."

This statute means that all United States money as identified above are a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal law mandating that a person or organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. For example, a bus line may prohibit payment of fares in pennies or dollar bills. In addition, movie theaters, convenience stores and gas stations may refuse to accept large denomination currency (usually notes above $20) as a matter of policy.

Don't believe me? Click on this www.ustreas.gov/opc/opc0034.html#quest6 and read it,

Don't like it? What are you going to do about it? What am I going to do about it? What can you do about it? Absolutely nothing! Every one gripes and complains. Only a few have tried to do anything about it. It fell on 98 percent of the population's deaf ears. They don't want to go back to real money. They believe in the confidence game of private scrip, in that it is money to them because it allows them to purchase things of value. It is nothing more than first lien debt that is a tax on that scrip whenever it transfers (changes hands) so it can be continually taxed.

Example:

You get paid a certain amount of scrip.  The IRS collects a portion through "income tax" (scrip taxes) leaving you with less scrip.  With what is left you buy a Refrigerator from a dealer.  He pays on the income from that sale at business tax rate, so part of your already taxed scrip gets paid to IRS again.  The dealer buys from the Mfg.. The Mfg. pays a tax on its income from selling to the dealer, which again is part of the scrip you received that was already taxed.  Finally it comes to the Mfg.. He pays an income tax on that sale to the dealer, so more scrip is paid.  So on the original amount you received the tax lien was collected upon many times over.

Let us say that you worked for that Mfg..  How did that Mfg. obtain that money to begin with?  He borrowed. From whom?  The bank.  What did he borrow to pay you?  Debt obligations denoted as ledger accounts.  Did the Mfg. transfer to you a ledger account (check)?  Yes he did. Did he have to account for his outlay to the IRS in the form of a W-2 for his business purposes?  Yes. Did you cash that ledger account for a debt obligation, Federal Reserve note that had a first lien on it already at a bank?  Yes.  And is that bank a part of the fiscal agent of the United States?  Yes. 

Is then, everyone dealing in banking under the Uniform Commercial Code using scrip that is privately made? Yes. Can the owner of that scrip call in a portion of it to offset the debt owed it by the United States?  Yes.  Is the IRS the collecting agency for the federal reserve to collect the debt the United States owes to the Federal Reserve?  Yes.

Do you think that Congress, the real criminal thieves, will admit this is what is happening? Do you think the IRS is going to admit this, but rather say "there are other statutes" and not admit what they are? Do you think any court will allow such an argument? Will they will pass it off as frivolous? You bet they will. They are all in on the scam and have been since taking real money away from the people. But is silver and gold really money belonging to the people if they themselves have not mined it, assayed it, had it melted down and coined it at a mint for the cost of minting as was previously done? Think about it.

What did the Lord Almighty say when Peter showed Him a coin with the picture of Caesar on it? "Render unto Caesar what is Caesars'." People, common man, YOU ARE NOT Caesar and never were. So is the United States coin actually Caesar's (U.S. which is defined as Congress Assembled) coin all over again?

Did not Peter have to pay a tribute for using Caesars coin? I'll let you decide if a private Federal Reserve scrip is their paper or your paper. When you exchange your labor for private paper, then as Ernie Ford sang, "You owe your soul to the company store." Especially when you claim to be a United States citizen.

Well you can take it or leave it, the choice is yours. I'm just suggesting this is another hidden fact Government thieves don't want you to know. This is just the tip of the iceberg. What is the common denominator in all tax scams? What does every one use in daily transactions if not paper scrip and checks that are the trade and business of banking of the fiscal agent of the United States? If the Lord Almighty came down and asked you what he asked of Peter, what would you pull out of your pocket and show him?

Here is part of the Reg.1.864-4 and remember what UNITED STATES they are talking about, therefore, you are non resident in the United States, therefore alien to the jurisdiction EXCEPT you are still liable, read the following:

(5) Special rules relating to banking, financing, or similar business activity—

(I)  Definition of banking, financing, or similar business. A nonresident alien individual or a foreign corporation shall be considered for purposes of this section and paragraph (b)(2) of § 1.864–5 to be engaged in the active conduct of a banking, financing, or similar business in the United States if at some time during the taxable year the taxpayer is engaged in business in the United States and the activities of such business consist of any one or more of the following activities carried on, in whole or in part, in the United States in transactions with persons situated within or without the United States:

(a) Receiving deposits of funds from the public,

(b) Making personal, mortgage, industrial, or other loans to the public,

(c) Purchasing, selling, discounting, or negotiating for the public on a regular basis, notes, drafts, checks, bills of exchange, acceptances, or other evidences of indebtedness,

(d) Issuing letters of credit to the public and negotiating drafts drawn thereunder,

(e) Providing trust services for the public, or

(f) Financing foreign exchange transactions for the public stocks or securities with active conduct of a banking, financing, or similar business.

Notwithstanding the rules in subpara-graphs (2) and (3) of this paragraph with respect to the asset-use test and the business-activities test, any dividends or interest from stocks or securities, or any gain or loss from the sale or exchange of stocks or securities which are capital assets, which is from sources within the United States and derived by a nonresident alien individual or a foreign corporation in the active conduct during the taxable year of a banking, financing, or similar business in the United States shall be treated as effectively connected for such year with the conduct of that business only if the stocks or securities giving rise to such income, gain, or loss are attributable to the U.S. office through which such business is carried on and—

(a) Were acquired—

        (1)  As a result of, or in the course of making loans to the public,

    (2)  In the course of distributing such stocks or securities to the public, or  

    (3)  For the purpose of being used to satisfy the reserve requirements, or other requirements similar to  reserve requirements, established by a duly constituted banking authority in the United States, or ----"

Now to prove that the same apply to US citizens read this small part from 26 CFR 1-861

(2) The term ''resident of the United States'', as used in this paragraph, includes

    (i)  an individual who at the time of payment of the interest is a resident of the United States,

   (ii)  a domestic corporation,

   (iii) a domestic partnership which at any time during its tax-able year is engaged in trade or business in the United States, or

   (iv) a foreign corporation or a foreign partnership, which at any time during its taxable year is engaged in trade or business in the United States.*** corporation on—

(a) Deposits with persons, including citizens of the United States or alien individuals and foreign or domestic partnerships or corporations, carrying on the banking business in the United States,

(b) Deposits or withdrawable accounts with savings institutions chartered and supervised as savings and loan or similar associations under Federal or State law, or

(c) Amounts held by an insurance company under an agreement to pay interest thereon,

Have a good day   
The Informer